← Shake Dry public research record

STAGE 2 · EXPLORATORY ARCHIVE ANALYSIS · VERSION 1

Shorter recorded dryer runtimes.
A question still to validate.

Analysis snapshot: September 6, 2026. Measurement period: August 18–September 5, 2026. This public edition summarizes an existing archive analysis, not a new controlled experiment or peer-reviewed paper.

Interpretation first: All 15 provisional comparison sets show lower median recorded runtime for shake-dry. This is descriptive evidence worth investigating—not proof of a causal effect or measured electricity savings. The practical research focus is reducing dryer running time to save energy.

Dataset and accounting

14 ZIP exports contained 116 exported run records. Removing 14 exact repeated records left 102 unique runs: 49 classified for this public report as shake-dry, 47 as direct-dry, and 6 invalid measurement. The 96 valid reviewed runs enter comparisons; invalid runs are excluded.

Method

Compare conditions within archive/measurement-date sets, a provisional proxy rather than verified person/dryer identity. Do not pool individual runtimes across sets. Exact duplicate start/stop/runtime signatures were counted once and their canonical labels agreed. Legacy review labels were normalized; comments were not parsed as reviews. Public condition names are shake-dry and direct-dry; the private source labels and measurements are unchanged.

Within-set median reduction (%) = 100 × (direct-dry median − shake-dry median) / direct-dry median. Medians were checked using integer-millisecond input. Displayed seconds use half-up rounding; differences are computed before rounding displayed medians.

Per-set observations

Anonymous set IDs preserve the source analysis order. Exact timestamps, export filenames, raw recordings, and private records are not included in this public edition. These IDs do not establish independent participants.

Median runtime reduction by provisional setS01 27.6%S02 * 46.6%S03 37.7%S04 36.2%S05 33.8%S06 * 42.8%S07 * 42.7%S08 * 29.2%S09 * 13.0%S10 * 39.5%S11 48.9%S12 43.9%S13 24.4%S14 * 53.8%S15 33.6%* Fewer than three runs in at least one condition.
Counts are shake-dry / direct-dry. Durations and differences are seconds. Invalid runs are excluded from both conditions.
Set n Shake-dry median direct-dry median Difference Reduction Invalid Caution
S01 5 / 5 7.880 10.880 3.000 27.57% 0
S02 3 / 1 8.518 15.942 7.424 46.57% 0 Small sample
S03 3 / 3 12.093 19.400 7.307 37.66% 0
S04 4 / 5 7.270 11.399 4.129 36.22% 1
S05 5 / 6 11.000 16.620 5.620 33.81% 0
S06 2 / 2 12.960 22.648 9.688 42.78% 0 Small sample
S07 1 / 1 9.081 15.860 6.779 42.74% 0 Small sample
S08 2 / 2 10.400 14.691 4.291 29.21% 0 Small sample
S09 1 / 1 12.299 14.140 1.841 13.02% 0 Small sample
S10 2 / 2 7.530 12.442 4.912 39.48% 0 Small sample
S11 4 / 4 5.861 11.461 5.600 48.86% 2
S12 6 / 6 10.358 18.459 8.102 43.89% 1
S13 5 / 4 7.419 9.819 2.400 24.44% 1
S14 1 / 1 8.378 18.119 9.741 53.76% 0 Small sample
S15 5 / 4 7.180 10.809 3.629 33.57% 1

Secondary energy scenarios — estimated savings

The equal-weight average of the 15 within-set arithmetic-mean differences is 5.646 seconds. This is not an average of the median percentages and is not a population estimate. The ratio of the equal-set mean runtimes corresponds to 38.02% lower runtime. It does not demonstrate that percentage of real-world energy savings.

Illustrative energy difference (Wh/use) = assumed power (W) × mean runtime difference (s) / 3600. At an assumed 1,500 W, this yields 2.353 Wh/use. The power is neither measured nor an established fleet average.

Small-sample sensitivity: Restricting to the eight sets with at least three runs per condition gives a mean difference of 4.967 seconds. This filter does not resolve the missing controls or establish independence.